New and repurposed drugs to treat multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis / Novos fármacos e fármacos repropostos para o tratamento da tuberculose multirresistente e extensivamente resistente

ABSTRACT Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB and XDR-TB, respectively) continue to represent a challenge for clinicians and public health authorities. Unfortunately, although there have been encouraging reports of higher success rates, the overall rate of favorable outcomes of M/XDR-TB treatment is only 54%, or much lower when the spectrum of drug resistance is beyond that of XDR-TB. Treating M/XDR-TB continues to be a difficult task, because of the high incidence of adverse events, the long duration of treatment, the high cost of the regimens used, and the drain on health care resources. Various trials and studies have recently been undertaken (some already published and others ongoing), all aimed at improving outcomes of M/XDR-TB treatment by changing the overall approach, shortening treatment duration, and developing a universal regimen. The objective of this review was to summarize what has been achieved to date, as far as new and repurposed drugs are concerned, with a special focus on delamanid, bedaquiline, pretomanid, clofazimine, carbapenems, and linezolid. After more than 40 years of neglect, greater attention has recently been paid to the need for new drugs to fight the "white plague", and promising results are being reported.

RESUMO A tuberculose multirresistente (TB-MDR, do inglês multidrug-resistant) e a extensivamente resistente (TB-XDR, do inglês extensively drug-resistant) continuam representando um desafio para os clínicos e as autoridades de saúde pública. Infelizmente, embora haja relatos encorajadores de taxas de sucesso maiores, a taxa global de desfechos favoráveis do tratamento da TB-MDR/XDR é de apenas 54%, ou muito menor quando o espectro de resistência aos fármacos vai além do da TB-XDR. O tratamento da TB-MDR/XDR continua sendo uma tarefa difícil, em razão da alta incidência de eventos adversos, do longo tempo de tratamento, do alto culto dos esquemas utilizados e da drenagem dos recursos de saúde. Diversos ensaios e estudos foram realizados recentemente (alguns já publicados e outros em andamento), todos visando a melhorar os desfechos do tratamento da TB-MDR/XDR por meio da alteração da abordagem geral, redução do tempo de tratamento e desenvolvimento de um esquema universal. O objetivo desta revisão foi resumir o que se conseguiu até o momento, no que se refere a novos fármacos e fármacos repropostos, dando foco especial para delamanid, bedaquilina, pretomanida, clofazimina, carbapenêmicos e linezolida. Após mais de 40 anos de negligência, recentemente foi dada mais atenção á necessidade de novos fármacos para se combater a "praga branca", e resultados promissores estão sendo relatados.

Avances en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis multirresistente / Advances in the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Resumen El tratamiento de las tuberculosis multidrogorresistentes (TBC-MDR) se basa en esquemas de fármacos con diseños muy variables, en pacientes con patrones de resistencia heterogéneos y seguimientos no estandarizados, lo que hace dificil plantear recomendaciones con fuerte nivel de evidencia. Además, sólo una minoría de estos enfermos recibe tratamiento a nivel mundial y con los actuales esquemas menos del 50% de los que logran ser tratados curan. Afortunadamente, durante los últimos años han aparecido nuevos medicamentos, (bedaquilina, delamanid y pretomanid), que están demostrando ser de real utilidad para estos pacientes en ensayos con mejor diseño y seguimiento, donde se puede establecer con mayor precisión la eficacia, toxicidad y grado de recaídas. Además, algunos fármacos ya conocidos, (fluoroquinolonas, linezolid, clofazimina) están siendo introducidos dentro de los nuevos esquemas de tratamiento.

Abstract Therapy of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) is based on trials with drugs with highly variable patterns of resistance and non-standardized follow-ups that make it difficult to provide recommendations with strong levels of evidence. Also, the vast majority of MDR-TB patients fail to receive therapy and those who receive it, only achieve around 50% of good results. Fortunately new drugs have emerged (bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid) that are being useful for these patients with better designed trials and monitoring, in which the efficacy, toxicity and degree of relapses can be evaluated more accurately. Some drugs already known (fluorquinolones, linezolid and clofazimine) are also being introduced in new schemes of therapy.

Efficacy, safety, tolerability and population pharmacokinetics of tedizolid, a novel antibiotic, in Latino patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Abstract Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections are caused mainly by Gram-positive bacteria which are often treated with intravenous vancomycin, daptomycin, or linezolid, with potential step down to oral linezolid for outpatients. Tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily treatment for six days demonstrated non-inferior efficacy, with a favourable safety profile, compared with linezolid 600 mg twice daily treatment for 10 days in the Phase 3 ESTABLISH-1 and -2 trials. The objective of the current post-hoc analysis of the integrated dataset of ESTABLISH-1 and -2 was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (N = 182) vs linezolid (N = 171) in patients of Latino origin enrolled into these trials. The baseline demographic characteristics of Latino patients were similar between the two treatment groups. Tedizolid demonstrated comparable efficacy to linezolid at 48–72 h in the intent-to-treat population (tedizolid: 80.2% vs linezolid: 81.9%). Sustained clinical success rates were comparable between tedizolid- and linezolid-treated Latino patients at end-of-therapy (tedizolid: 86.8% vs linezolid: 88.9%). Tedizolid phosphate treatment was well tolerated by Latino patients in the safety population with lower abnormal platelet counts at end-of-therapy (tedizolid: 3.4% vs linezolid: 11.3%, p = 0.0120) and lower incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (tedizolid: 16.5% vs linezolid: 23.5%). Population pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that estimated tedizolid exposure measures in Latino patients vs non-Latino patients were similar. These findings demonstrate that tedizolid phosphate 200 mg, once daily treatment for six days was efficacious and well tolerated by patients of Latino origin, without warranting dose adjustment.

Efficacy and safety of rilmenidine, a selective imidazoline I1 receptor binding ligand, in mild-to-moderate Thai hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Rilmenidine is an antihypertensive agent that selectively binds to imidazoline I1 receptor located in the brainstem and kidney. It acts both centrally by reducing sympathetic overactivity and in the kidney by decreasing water and sodium overload. This dual action leads to the immediate and delayed control of blood pressure caused by this drug. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of rilmenidine as monotherapy in mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients. METHOD: An 8-week, open-labeled, multicenter study was conducted in Thai patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Rilmenidine 1 mg/day was given for 8 weeks. The dose could be titrated up to 2 mg/day according to the patient's blood pressure response at week 4. The primary efficacy parameters were the mean reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The proportions of patients whose blood pressure normalized or responded were evaluated as secondary efficacy parameters. Safety parameters were assessed by the changes in heart rate and reported side effects during the treatment period. RESULTS: 103 subjects (44.7% men) with a mean age of 53 +/- 9.7 years completed the 8-week follow-up. At baseline, 46.6 per cent and 53.4 per cent of the patients were classified with mild and moderate hypertension, respectively. The mean blood pressure was 154/93 mmHg. After the 8-week treatment, there was a significant decrease in blood pressure to 140/86 mmHg (p < 0.001), with mean pressure reduction of 14/7.5 mmHg. The normalization rate was 44 per cent and the response rate was 68 per cent. No significant changes were found for mean heart rate and any laboratory parameters tested. Only 17 patients reported mild and transient side effects such as drowsiness and dryness of the mouth and throat, which required no treatment. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that rilmenidine is an effective and well tolerated monotherapy in Thai patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

Toloxatona y depresión / Toloxatone and depression

Los autores informan la experiencia recogida con la utilización, en 101 pacientes deprimidos, de un antidepressivo de segunda generación, la toloxatona: molécula original dotada de una actividad inhibidora específica y reversible de la MAO A. Al momento de la admisión, los 101 pacientes con enfermedad depresiva presentaban un score mínimo de 20 puntos en al Escala de Hamilton y un puntaje no inferior a 4 en el Test del índice de endogeneidad de Fischer, Fernández Labriola y Rodríguez Casanova. En 57 de ellos se dispuso de perfiles biológicos: Fenil-etilamina, NA y MHPG. Asimismo, en el momento de la admisión ningún paciente estaba ingiriendo antidepresivos. El estudio fue un doble ciego vs. placebo; la edad promedio de los pacientes era de 46 años. El experimento duró 6 semanas. La dosis diaria total se estandardizó en 400mg de toloxatona. Hubo modificaciones significativas en 51 pacietnes. De los 50 casos que recibieron principio activo, 37 obtuvieron un resultado "escelente" o "bueno". Los marcadores biológicos señalaron el perfil de pacientes que mejor responden a la molécula: los de actividad noradrenérgica disminuida. Las depresiones sin ansiedad y las depresiones inhibidas son las patologías de elección para la utilización